<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boston&#8217;s Largest and Most Expensive Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bostoncondoloft.com/bostons-largest-and-most-expensive-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bostoncondoloft.com/bostons-largest-and-most-expensive-home/</link>
	<description>A Boston Real Estate Blog Highlighting The In's &#38; Out's Of Living Downtown Boston.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 02:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.bostoncondoloft.com/bostons-largest-and-most-expensive-home/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.condodomain.com/blog/?p=904#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>See, Thomas, I agree with you here, but here's the thing...

The discourse of the company lies within a borderland of theory...

Between those properties which are very luxurious and can only be afforded by very luxurious individuals ... and thus perhaps those that might consider an extra half million a nice donation to an organization...

And those properties and clients for whom the refund check is a huge deal, a mindful decision of how to use it towards all those costs associated with home buying, or towards new things like furniture that can extend beyond IKEA etc...

The discourse of the company lies between and serves the clients' priorities no matter what... I quote Jess "No matter what the cost of the property, all our clients are served the same..." (that's not a direct quote, but something like that..."  

So, how will the company continue to live out within these two discourse borderlands...to which theory can we both make the luxury folks feel luxurious and the those that are looking at a property that is let's say 300 grand in Dallas still feel luxurious ...and yet have different, way different, needs of the rebate check?

Make sense.  You strike me as a theory man, so I throw out all this gibble gabble.  If you're like to continue the convo anytime, be sure to drop a note or visit the blog :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, Thomas, I agree with you here, but here&#8217;s the thing&#8230;</p>
<p>The discourse of the company lies within a borderland of theory&#8230;</p>
<p>Between those properties which are very luxurious and can only be afforded by very luxurious individuals &#8230; and thus perhaps those that might consider an extra half million a nice donation to an organization&#8230;</p>
<p>And those properties and clients for whom the refund check is a huge deal, a mindful decision of how to use it towards all those costs associated with home buying, or towards new things like furniture that can extend beyond IKEA etc&#8230;</p>
<p>The discourse of the company lies between and serves the clients&#8217; priorities no matter what&#8230; I quote Jess &#8220;No matter what the cost of the property, all our clients are served the same&#8230;&#8221; (that&#8217;s not a direct quote, but something like that&#8230;&#8221;  </p>
<p>So, how will the company continue to live out within these two discourse borderlands&#8230;to which theory can we both make the luxury folks feel luxurious and the those that are looking at a property that is let&#8217;s say 300 grand in Dallas still feel luxurious &#8230;and yet have different, way different, needs of the rebate check?</p>
<p>Make sense.  You strike me as a theory man, so I throw out all this gibble gabble.  If you&#8217;re like to continue the convo anytime, be sure to drop a note or visit the blog <img src='http://www.bostoncondoloft.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Cincotti</title>
		<link>http://www.bostoncondoloft.com/bostons-largest-and-most-expensive-home/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Cincotti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.condodomain.com/blog/?p=904#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>That would be a 570,000 refund check from condoDomain!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be a 570,000 refund check from condoDomain!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boston Resident</title>
		<link>http://www.bostoncondoloft.com/bostons-largest-and-most-expensive-home/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Boston Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.condodomain.com/blog/?p=904#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>I'd have to agree with you both...

Since Boston gets cold, indoor swimming space would be nice in such an expensive home...either home...

But, considering the descriptions of both estates, you could swim in the bathtubs no?  It seems that anything would be possible with such crazy plans and visions at both places...

I don't know though - the best home seems to be when you make every context your home when leave "home" - so why have such a big home?  

I have a hard time keeping 2000 square feet clean!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with you both&#8230;</p>
<p>Since Boston gets cold, indoor swimming space would be nice in such an expensive home&#8230;either home&#8230;</p>
<p>But, considering the descriptions of both estates, you could swim in the bathtubs no?  It seems that anything would be possible with such crazy plans and visions at both places&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know though - the best home seems to be when you make every context your home when leave &#8220;home&#8221; - so why have such a big home?  </p>
<p>I have a hard time keeping 2000 square feet clean!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Longo</title>
		<link>http://www.bostoncondoloft.com/bostons-largest-and-most-expensive-home/#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Longo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 15:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.condodomain.com/blog/?p=904#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>BL don't knock Boston.  I didnt see a pool at the Heather Lane estate on Nantucket either and that was $19M as a shell.

But...if you do insist on a pool check out this listing in the Back Bay:  http://boston.condodomain.com/Boston-Real-Estate-MLS/74-Beacon-Street/383009/70758865/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BL don&#8217;t knock Boston.  I didnt see a pool at the Heather Lane estate on Nantucket either and that was $19M as a shell.</p>
<p>But&#8230;if you do insist on a pool check out this listing in the Back Bay:  <a href="http://boston.condodomain.com/Boston-Real-Estate-MLS/74-Beacon-Street/383009/70758865/" rel="nofollow">http://boston.condodomain.com/Boston-Real-Estate-MLS/74-Beacon-Street/383009/70758865/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BL</title>
		<link>http://www.bostoncondoloft.com/bostons-largest-and-most-expensive-home/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>BL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston.condodomain.com/blog/?p=904#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>No pool?  For $23,000,000 I would at least expect a pool...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No pool?  For $23,000,000 I would at least expect a pool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
